I have no doubt in my mind that nothing I produce will change Dr. Hart’s mind on the issue of vaccine safety. There is a strange bent to human beings in that we really do not like being told or shown that we are wrong, that based on facts presented, we have made a bad choice and are following charlatans, or worse, people bent on doing evil. Of all people, Dr. Hart should know this from his many frustrating interactions with obdurate Thomists who are unaffected by the multitude of facts given them to prove Universal Restoration of all mankind. It is quite amazing to see the linguistic and hermeneutic gymnastics that people will resort to in order to keep their belief in an eternal hell. Tell a believer in eternal hell that Dr. Illaria Ramelli has shown, in her massive tome on Universalism, that the Greek word “aionios” in no way carries the weight of meaning “eternal” and they will go a long-winded rant in an effort to contradict what they have been shown, while not carrying either the theological or hermeneutical weight that Dr. Ramelli owns. Kind of like me stepping into a boxing ring to have a go with Mike Tyson. It would not be pretty. For those of us who have deeply studied the issue, it is actually sad to watch them publicly embarrass themselves.

Sadly, I have to say this same thing about one of my heroes, Dr. Hart. In his first response to me, he claimed to be the recipient of a massive volume of both personal knowledge regarding vaccines, as well as having close friendships with experts in the field of virology. I’m sorry, Dr. Hart, but may I see your personal credentials as a virologist? Or are you more depending upon articles which you may have studied, just as I depend on listening to you and others, such as Fr. Aiden Kimel, to deepen my understand of God’s redemption of all mankind? Let’s face it, all of us can become third-hand experts by way of studying the work of others. You are no exception. Yes, you are brilliant in your field, quite well educated and studied in many facets, but I fear that in this one area, you are giving way to emotionalism rather than the expertise of those who are speaking against the Covid 19 “vaccine.” ¹ And pushing off those who are sounding a warning against vaccines by calling them “hacks” and the like is hardly a scholarly manner of rebuttal.

Again, I have the temerity to ask, are you, sir, a university educated and practicing virologist and immunologist, or does the sum total of your expertise come from what you have read from those defending the Covid 19 “vaccine”? Until you develop a vaccine of your own, I think you might want to pay more attention to what Dr. Malone is saying and the concerns he has. I think it is the height of audacity to infer that this man, and all other scientists, virologists, doctors, and immunologists, who with him are opposing the Covid 19 vaccine, to be a “hack,” as you did. That is tantamount to someone referring to you as a plebeian theologian. I’m sorry, it doesn’t wash.

Attacking the credentials of those with whom you disagree has always been a defense (sometimes the first, if debate is not desired) of those who neither desire debate nor have a desire to investigate with an open mind the facts presented. In this contentious issue of whether or not the Covid 19 “vaccine” is safe and effective, I hope you realize, as I have tried to present, that there are powerful forces behind the “vaccine” who are interested only in making money. The bottom line counts, and deaths are just collateral damage to the achieved goal. And, like all people of suspect morality and decency, they have their toadies who revel in the attention their obsequiousness provides.

An example of such a toady ² would be the boot-licking congresswoman from the State of Washington, Congresswoman Susan DelBene, who in a press release ³ called for the removal of two recently appointed anti-vax OB/GYNs to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). This is nothing short of kissing up to Big Pharma. I would like a little glimpse at her bank account statements. I can’t get over the feeling that there is money involved here.

Meanwhile, a panel researchers, doctors, and experts, wrote to the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology with the following concern:

Sir,

We read with interest the systematic review by Rimmer et al. (2023) and noted our manuscript (Thorp et al., 2022) that reported significant harms to pregnant women and infants was omitted. We performed a population-based retrospective cohort study assessing rates of adverse events (AEs) after COVID-19 vaccines experienced by women of reproductive age, focusing on pregnancy and menstruation, using data collected by the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) database from 1 January 1998 to 30 June 2022. The proportional reporting ratio comparing AEs reported after COVID-19 vaccines with those reported after influenza vaccines is significantly increased (≥2.0) for COVID-19 vaccine for menstrual abnormality, miscarriage, fetal chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformation, fetal cystic hygroma, fetal cardiac disorders, fetal cardiac arrest, fetal arrhythmias, fetal vascular malperfusion, fetal growth abnormalities, fetal abnormal surveillance, placental thrombosis, fetal death/stillbirth, low amniotic fluid, preeclampsia, premature delivery, preterm premature rupture of membrane, and premature baby death. When normalized by time-available, doses-given, or number of persons vaccinated, all COVID-19 vaccine AEs far exceed the safety signal on all recognized thresholds. Specifically for miscarriage we found the global relative risk for was 177 (95% CI 114.4–283.5) compared to influenza vaccination. We believe inclusion of our data in Rimmer et al. (2023) would correct a Type II error and lead to a conclusion of excess harm, necessitating a worldwide moratorium on the use of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnancy. (Authors James A Thorp , Claire Rogers , Michael P Deskevich , Stewart Tankersley , Albert Benavides , Megan D Redshaw , Peter A McCullough)

“Our manuscript was omitted.” Really? Don’t tell me that there is not an agenda out there regarding the pushing of vaccines on the public. This is the same kind of behavior that was found out regarding the Pfizer trials on pregnant women, where the results were conveniently lost after it was discovered that 80% of the women were having spontaneous miscarriages. ⁴ Tell me, Dr. Hart, are all these doctors and researchers giving facts, or are they just “hacks” who are out to get their fifteen minutes of fame before fading into obscurity? If you think that latter, then prove it! And when I say that, I mean YOU prove it. Don’t quote some other doctors who may well be getting money under the table from Big Pharma. YOU show us your bona fides in this field or at least have the decency, if you can’t do that, to stop the pejoratives. Not only is it bad debate form, it is a pretty wretched Christian witness.

Dr. Hart’s rejoinder to me, when I called him out on this behavior, was to state that these “hacks” are killing millions with their misinformation. Where, might I ask, is this same anger in light of the VAERS report that continues to grow larger each day with new deaths and disfigurements of the vaccinated? Day by day I find more first person stories from parents who gave their daughters the Gardasil vaccine and within weeks watched their daughter die. Week after week you can find videos of children having violent spasms after being vaccinated. There are whole websites dedicated to gathering data on vaccine injuries and deaths. Are they all lying, Dr. Hart? I get the senses that you are far from unbiased in this regard, and anything that the government puts out is sacrosanct and not to be questioned. The same government that funds abortions, sends arms to dictators around the world, that starts wars by means of false flags operations in order to enrich the Military/Industrial complex, and mum about the most outrageous cruelties, is somehow a faithful defender of our health? Somehow you are willing to believe that in the area of medicines and treatments, these same horrendous liars, con artists, thieves, and general ne’er-do-wells are to be trusted without question!

I don’t think so!

1. One such man who is sounding the alarm against the “vaccine” is Dr. Robert Malone. Let’s look at his credentials: Robert W. Malone, MD, MS, is a virologist and immunologist and an original inventor of mRNA delivery and vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He serves on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices and is the author of multiple books, the most recent of which is “PsyWar: Enforcing the New World Order,” co-written with his wife, Dr. Jill Glasspool Malone. The Drs. Malone are the founders of the Malone Institute, which focuses on issues related to government, the biological sciences, and medicine. ↩︎
2. Yes, I am devolving to the same name-calling for which I am taking Dr. Hart to task. I can, however, show that this woman is exactly what I am calling her by bringing attention to the facts that she is conveniently ignoring. Dr. Hart has yet to show with proof that the doctors, scientists, virologists, and others to whom he has attached the disparaging moniker of “hack” are actually to be regarded as such, rather than the experts that they are. Therein lies the difference. ↩︎
3. From a press release by Congresswoman DelBene: ““What was once a trusted panel of vaccine experts has become a hand-selected group of unqualified vaccine skeptics who have undermined years of scientific integrity and vetted public health practices,” the lawmakers wrote to Kennedy.
   
   Urato has said that vaccine science is not “long-settled.” In 2023, he posted a link to a study that looked at vaccines and breastfeeding, saying, “we don’t know the risks this poses.” Studies show that breastfeeding after COVID-19 vaccines is safe.
   
   Dr. Biss said that after COVID-19 she was now “anti-vaccine.” At a congressional hearing in November 2023, Dr. Biss repeated the false claim that taking the COVID-19 vaccine during pregnancy increased the risk of miscarriage.
   
   “We are deeply concerned that the addition of Dr. Urato and Dr. Biss to ACIP do not make pregnant women and their children healthier. Instead, their false, harmful ideologies put women and their children’s lives at risk. The opinions of Dr. Urato and Dr. Biss are not founded in evidence-based science, but in anti-vaccine rhetoric that harms public health as a whole,” the letter continues.
   The medical community broadly rejects the connection between COVID-19 and miscarriages. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommends that all pregnant and breastfeeding women receive an updated COVID-19 vaccine or booster. The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) also strongly recommends that pregnant women receive the vaccine. ↩︎
4. OB/GYN Doctor Kimberly Biss | https://drbowden.substack.com/p/behind-the-numbers-miscarriages-post ↩︎